RSS FeedPageRank, Android and iPhone – How to use naturally occurring capabilities to your advantage
The implementation of PageRank was a watershed moment in technology that showed us one thing – how naturally occurring data could be used to create an amazingly good score, and thus Crowdsourcing was born. Next up (many years later) was the YouTube (which was a Google acquisition, not an in house technology), but gelled pretty well with their crowdsourcing mentality. Next up (which took much longer to pull about), was the Android, which allowed Google to slowly penetrate a very crowded (no pun intended) cellphone market, again using the power of crowdsourcing. In this however, it had a clear precedent – Apple, although an amazingly unlikely proponent, had basically invented the app market concept for the cellphones, using the very successful iPhone app stores. Google was the one to realize that no matter how sophisticated your cellphone and OS is (BlackBerry), a crowd of spaghetti beats one strong rope, and further, crowdsourcing can only be competed with crowdsourcing. That competition between iOS and Android still goes on, and each of them tries to make their product sticky, by making people dependent not only on the device, but also on the myriad applications that those devices support. Now, BlackBerry is supposed to be coming up with its even better OS, but I wonder how much difference it can make,
considering that their OS was already the best one, in terms of robustness and OS level functionality. Where it got beat was simply by millions of apps, and that is where it clearly has a catch up role to play. How should it plan to compete with Android (or iOS) where millions of dedicated developers are writing interesting applications, and people are writing tutorials and books on how to create those interesting applications?
This idea of using naturally occurring data (or capabilities, if abstracted at one level) is not limited to cellphone market only. Examples abound in many other vertices. For examples, one of the reasons that NX CCS is so successful in integrating logistics data is that it simply uses the data that already exists – bills of lading, shipping notices, tracking information etc. Similarly, the success of TripIt is largely attributable to the fact that they simply use the reservation confirmations that already existed before their product came about. This idea itself can be considered an important ingredient in product stickiness – how much of what the product needs to work already exists? If the answer to that is, not so much, then clearly the idea or the product will have a shorter adoption cycle.
Has Google Gone Evil?
One of the premises of Google was “Do No Evil”. Their original claim to fame was the (Larry) PageRank algorithm, and while of course their algorithm has evolved entirely over the last 10+ years and is no longer as simple as the original PageRank, still, their moral standard was that: “No sponsorship can affect the quality of their search results.” In other words, you couldn’t just buy a higher rank in the search listing for a specific keyword. Sure, you can buy an ad spot using the Google AdWords for the keyword (say “insurance”) and if you can afford to pay $54.91 for each click, then sure, by all means, your website can be shown, but it will be shown on the side, and clearly marked with the word ‘Advertisement’.
This is where it gets interesting. What is “clearly marked”? How clear is clear? Is this clear enough for you? Is this clear enough? How about this: clear. This is the aspect in which Google’s moral standard has dropped faster than the housing market of 2008. Consider this snapshot that I took for doing a vanity search on enterprise dashboards.
I can still find out which of the top links are advertisements, I just have to hold my laptop screen at a few different angles. (It works out – just requires a little persistence. A bit of screen moving never killed anyone.)
So, I think all said and done, the links are clearly marked. Just depends on what you call clear. And certainly, Google hasn’t gone evil. Just depends on what you call evil.
806-686-1186 Phishing Scam by SMS
So, now phishing has moved to SMS. Here is the SMS I got from this number:
8066861186@growth_alert.com
Action required for your Wells Fargo account.
Call 1-806-6861-186 and follow instructions !
I don’t have a Wells Fargo account, but that shouldn’t stop me from calling them and giving all the information, right? (Reports at 800notes.com confirm this as phishing spam.) So, I called them, and this is the shpiel they give on the phone:
Welcome to customer service – electronic verification services.
Our reference show that your account is restricted. You are required to run a brief verification process in order to verify that you are in possession of your credit card.
During this process to protect your information and to maintain complete privacy customer service assistance will not be available as the entire verification process is computer generated and conducted.
Please stay on the line while we transfer your call to activate your card and remove the restriction and remove the restriction.
FAIL!!!
Now enter your 16 digits credit card number followed by the # key.
FAIL!!!
Now enter your 16 digits credit card number followed by the # key.
I like how they are willing to do so many things even though I am not even their customer! Really, brings tears to my eyes. It is really like that Nordstrom guy who cheerfully gift wrapped products a customer bought at Macy’s.
Can a tablet be available for $10?
Amazon undercut Apple by 300$. Now Aakash has arrived for 45$. (Perhaps it is not a fair comparison, but still.) What is next in the tablet PC market?
When Suneet Singh Tuli, the producer of 45$ Aakash was asked if a 10$ tablet was possible, this is what he said: “When I got my first Macintosh, it cost $5000. Today for $45, I can take home an “Aakash”. Tomorrow, it could cost me $10.”
We may hear more from this guy in future.
Steve Jobs – RIP
“We just wanted to build the best thing we could build.” — Steve Jobs
This is a part of 3 favorite quotes by Steve Jobs. This line is the epitome of all successful product development. Best products are the ones that we create that we wanted to use. Whether it is the user interface, the back end, the wires, what have you – it should really be the best, even if no one will ever see it. This strategy is very different the strategy of General Motors, which tried to save money by building auto parts that were outliving the car itself to lower specifications. Well, their stock results are a bit different too.
RIP Steve.
Apps